Former New Mexico Governor explains why he abolished the death penalty in his state

Share:

Former New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson abolished the death penalty in his state in 2009 because, he says, “Empirical evidence and common sense convinced me that the death penalty is an ineffective deterrent, is unfairly applied and has become increasingly costly for states.”

In an op-ed in the Washington Post today, Richardson says states like Arkansas, which carried out six executions in April, and Delaware, where the state’s House of Representatives voted to reinstitute its death penalty after its state Supreme Court struck it down last year, could see the private sector boycotting them “in the same way that the private sector responded to anti-LGBT laws passed in states such as Indiana and North Carolina, death-penalty states have to recognize that our increasingly small world is watching, and organizing against wrong-headed public policy by redirecting investment dollars.”

Pointing out that two anti-death penalty candidates won their party’s nomination for district attorney in Jefferson County, Alabama and Philadelphia, Richardson says the tide is turning to ending the death penalty.

Still, he says, “I worry about America’s isolation on this critical human rights issue.”

 

 

 

You might also be interested in...

Tennessee is second state to pass a bill making child rape a capital offense

Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee on Tuesday signed into law a bill that will allow a person to be sentenced to...
Read More

Trump plans to execute all 42 people on federal death row if reelected

Donald Trump is promising that if he is reelected in November, he will execute every one of the 42 men...
Read More

LA Times: “Of course, the death penalty is racist. And it would be wrong even if it weren’t.”

“Of course, the death penalty is racist. And it would be wrong even if it weren’t,” the Los Angeles Times...
Read More