Court finds South Carolina’s execution methods unconstitutional

Share:

South Carolina’s plan to execute men and women by electrocution or firing squad constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the state Constitution, a state judge ruled today, the State reports.

The legislature  “ignored advances in scientific research and evolving standards of humanity and decency” when it voted last year to force people to be killed by electric chair or firing squad if they refuse to choose a method of execution, Circuit Court Judge Jocelyn Newman wrote in her opinion.

Newman’s 39-page opinion lays out in excruciating detail how a person killed by electrocution or firing squad dies. Both methods cause extreme pain and suffering, and death is not immediate. As a result, both methods violate the state Constitution,

“Because both methods are unconstitutional, the statutes creation of an inmates right ‘to elect the manner of their execution’ is violated by the fact that an inmate does not have a choice between two constitutional methods of execution,” she noted.

Executions in South Carolina have been on hold since 2011because officials have been unable to obtain lethal injection drugs.

According to the State, Gov. Henry McMaster said he will appeal the decision, sending the case to the state Supreme Court for a ruling.

You might also be interested in...

Oklahoma delays seven execution dates, including Richard Glossip’s

The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals granted a motion filed by newly-elected Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond to slow down...
Read More

Report reveals Tennessee’s appalling execution protocol

2022 was the “year of the botched execution,” according to the Death Penalty Information Center. And now, a 166-page report...
Read More

CA Supreme Court to give 18-25-year-olds sentenced to lwop a second look

The California Supreme Court granted review earlier this month on whether people serving life-without-parole sentences for crimes committed when they...
Read More