Former New Mexico Governor explains why he abolished the death penalty in his state

Share:

Former New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson abolished the death penalty in his state in 2009 because, he says, “Empirical evidence and common sense convinced me that the death penalty is an ineffective deterrent, is unfairly applied and has become increasingly costly for states.”

In an op-ed in the Washington Post today, Richardson says states like Arkansas, which carried out six executions in April, and Delaware, where the state’s House of Representatives voted to reinstitute its death penalty after its state Supreme Court struck it down last year, could see the private sector boycotting them “in the same way that the private sector responded to anti-LGBT laws passed in states such as Indiana and North Carolina, death-penalty states have to recognize that our increasingly small world is watching, and organizing against wrong-headed public policy by redirecting investment dollars.”

Pointing out that two anti-death penalty candidates won their party’s nomination for district attorney in Jefferson County, Alabama and Philadelphia, Richardson says the tide is turning to ending the death penalty.

Still, he says, “I worry about America’s isolation on this critical human rights issue.”

 

 

 

You might also be interested in...

“There are few forms of torture worse for the human soul than isolation.”

California Gov. Gavin Newsom “has demonstrated a callous disregard for the dark history” of the use of solitary confinement in...
Read More

Another death sentence was overturned in Alameda County because of prosecutorial misconduct

Curtis Lee Ervin was sentenced to death in 1991 for the murder-for-hire of Carlene McDonald in 1986. Late last month,...
Read More

No heat relief in California prisons and jails

A woman incarcerated at the Central California Women’s Facility in Chowchilla died earlier this month during a heat wave that...
Read More