SCOTUS to consider anti-gay bias case


On Thursday, the Supreme Court considered whether to take the case of a South Dakota death row prisoner who maintains he was sentenced to death because of anti-gay bias on the jury.

Charles Rhines, convicted of the 1992 murder of Donnivan Schaeffer during a robbery, was sentenced to death in 1993. While the jurors deliberated whether to sentence him to death or life without parole, they sent the trial judge questions asking would Rhines “be jailed alone or will he have a cellmate,” and “Will he be able to create a group of followers or admirers,” and whether he would “be allowed to discuss describe, or brag about his crime to other inmates, especially new and or young men jailed for lesser crimes.”

The questions may seem odd, but there is strong evidence that they were asked because Rhines is gay and, according to juror statements, “There was lots of discussion of homosexuality” in the jury room and “a lot of disgust.” Another juror said that sentencing him to life without parole would mean “We’d be sending him where he wants to go.”

However, this evidence wasn’t discovered until after Rhines’ appeals had been rejected by federal courts. It is now up to the Supreme Court to send a message that bias of any kind, whether it be racist, sexist, or anti-gay is unconstitutional. As Chief Justice John Roberts said in his majority opinion in Buck v. Davis (2017),  in which the Court reversed Duane Buck’s death sentence because it was imposed at least partly because he is black, “Our criminal law punishes people for what they do, not who they are. That it concerned race amplifies the problem.” The fact that in this case it concerned sexual identity amplifies it even further.

You might also be interested in...

The tragic case of Kevin Johnson, set to be killed by Missouri this month

Missouri killed Kevin Johnson on Tuesday evening. He was sentenced to death for killing Kirkwood police officer Sgt. William McEntee...
Read More

Tennessee’s shameful and shocking treatment of Henry Hodges

A judge’s order late last month means a man on Tennessee’s death row, who slit his wrists before severing his...
Read More

Oklahoma high court denies both of Glossip’s petitions for a hearing on new evidence

In one week, the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals denied two petitions filed by Richard Glossip for an evidentiary hearing...
Read More